No Responses to “Punctuational cleansing”

  1. Scraps says:

    I have long campaigned against the hyphen. Not the complete elimination of the hyphen — as you note, it is sometimes necessary for clarity — but the restriction of its use to instances when it is truly required. The copy editing rules for hyphens are mostly a case of needless regularizing, inconsistently sensible; I spend an annoying out of my copy editing time on hyphens, because damned few writers are thoroughly conversant with any style book’s hyphen rules (and I don’t blame them). The alternative is simply to make judgment calls case by case, which would result in far fewer hyphens and no less sense (or art).

  2. John Berry says:

    “Eventually, hyphens outlive their usefulness, though, right?” Mostly, yes. But there are occasional words where the need for a hyphen never goes away – re-form vs. reform, for instance. When you mean “form again,” you simply have to include the hyphen; otherwise, everyone will think first of reform, which is something entirely different.

  3. Julie Gomoll says:

    Eventually, hyphens outlive their usefulness, though, right? We no longer type “no-one” or “to-day”. I have no interest in doing away with hyphens, but I do think they’re overused. Even curmudgeonly William Safire commented today in his On Language column in the NYT:

    “But don’t take my word for it; I was a college dropout. (That smarmy humility is a cop-out, a word not old enough to have lost its hyphen.)”

    Hopefully, LaunchPad Coworking will be popular enough that clarity won’t be an issue for long :)

Leave a Reply